Skip navigation

Food Standards Agency

Saturday 4 July 2009

Safer food better business banner

AZ-Directory What's New

B08002: Maintenance and improvements of the Food MicroModel database

Friday 30 April 2004

This project aims to improve the Food MicroModel database as well as the mathematical models developed and validated within the database.

Study Duration : April 2001 to March 2002

Contractor : Institute of Food Research (IFR)

Background

The Food MicroModel database managed by the Institute of Food Research (IFR) is one of the largest systematically organised databases on bacterial responses to food environments. It stores growth, survival and death data generated under a former Government-funded research and kinetic parameters collected from scientific literature. The database needs regular maintenance and improvement to keep pace with the fast developments in IT and computation, as well as servicing its computer programs.

The aim of this project is to improve the Food MicroModel database as well as the mathematical models developed and validated within the database.

Research Approach

The project objectives are to:

1. Access-Excel database-prediction connection
Connect the Food MicroModel Access database with an Excel add-in, developed by the IFR, which can carry out the predicting procedures. This would enable users to obtain more sophisticated predictions (e.g. under changing in temperatures) and it would also facilitate comparisons of predicted curves with raw data.

2. Implement dynamic models for growth
Take account of the previous history of the cells (e.g. temperature profile) by introducing the physiological state parameter. Estimate lag by means of the parameter. The physiological state parameter quantifies the history effect (e.g. the effect of processing of the food before growth).

3. Estimate errors of prediction
To provide for Food MicroModel users with a measure of reliability of predictions. A mathematically well-established method for error estimation will be added to the predictions.

4. Provide indicators for model acceptability
There are no agreed standard measures to indicate when a predictive model is mathematically and biologically acceptable. Appropriate user-friendly indicators (bias and precision, robustness, etc) would greatly improve the credibility of predictive models and the Food MicroModel software. Those indicators would be calculated when remodelling the data and validating the improved and any new models.

5. Improve model capability to predict no-growth
Current Food MicroModels have been developed using growth data only from experiments carried out in broth. This has resulted in models that tend to estimate the 'worst-case' scenario – growth that is faster than is likely to occur in foods. Such models are especially conservative around the growth/no-growth boundary. The unified database IFR created (containing both the original experimental and literature data) can be used to develop a model that coincides with the validated growth model in the growth region and zero growth in the no-growth region. This requires new effort to model the interface between growth and no-growth regions.

Tell a Friend

Printer friendly

Contact us

Get alerts

Our Sites

Find out what our other sites have to offer

Change Text Only Settings

Graphic version of this page